I pulled out my Leica IIIf again. It’s been photographed before, and it still holds its place. Not because it’s old, but because it represents a way of working that hasn’t changed as much as people think. And I still have a love of the look of film.
Leica’s origins go back to Oskar Barnack, who took 35mm motion picture film and turned it into a still photography format. That decision made cameras smaller, faster, and far more usable in real-world situations. It shifted photography away from being staged and into something more immediate.
What followed wasn’t just a camera system, it was a look. The color palette you see in Leica work, and hinted at in the LFI Magazine cover behind this camera, is controlled rather than exaggerated. Skin tones stay natural. Colors separate instead of competing.
Then there’s Hasselblad, working at a different pace. Medium format, larger negatives, more deliberate compositions. Where Leica moves quickly, Hasselblad slows everything down. The result is depth, tonal range, and structure.
That carries forward directly into my own work. My long-time preference has been Hasselblad digital, particularly the CCD sensor versions. There’s a specific color palette that comes out of those files that still stands apart. It’s not overly processed, not chasing saturation, just clean, controlled color with depth. It feels closer to film than most modern digital systems.
There’s a reason NASA chose Hasselblad for the Apollo 11 Moon landing. Those images required reliability and the ability to hold detail across extreme conditions. The same qualities show up in controlled studio work, just applied differently.
Film ties all of this together. It forces decisions early. Exposure, contrast, color balance, all set before you ever see the result. That constraint shapes the outcome. Grain becomes texture. Highlights roll instead of breaking. Blacks hold information.
This photograph isn’t about nostalgia. The Leica sits there with its mechanical dials and engraved markings, built to do one thing well. The magazine behind it points to the result, what all of that engineering was built to produce.
And even now, with everything available, that way of seeing still carries through.
That usually brings to mind something simple. Blankets, baskets, sunlight, maybe a quiet afternoon without much to it.
For a long time I’ve been drawn to the world of Weimar Berlin, and more recently I’ve started working through that fascination visually. Not as documentation, but as something constructed. A way of placing that atmosphere into new settings and seeing how it holds.
This exploration moves between my AI-generated work and my own photography, carrying the same ideas across both.
So I started wondering what happens when that same energy leaves the nightclub and moves outdoors.
The setting changes. The light changes. But the behavior doesn’t fully follow.
A picnic blanket replaces the dance floor. Champagne is still there. The formality of dress starts to slip. Jackets open, clothing loosens, and what began as something composed starts to move in another direction.
Not staged. Not announced. Just unfolding.
People settle into the space differently. Closer than expected. More comfortable than they should be. Conversations drift, attention shifts, and the moment becomes less about the setting and more about what’s happening within it.
That’s where these images come from.
Not a recreation, but a continuation. Taking that same sense of indulgence, tension, and quiet defiance and placing it somewhere it doesn’t quite belong. The permissiveness and decadence of the moment, where boundaries move.
This frame, pulled from a series of moments, becomes the introduction. Fragments of the same idea, happening across different spaces, connected by the same atmosphere.
This is just one direction it can go. More of my Weimar era concepts to follow.
More of my photography, from food to everything in between, is on my website at https://www.secondfocus.com.
SecondFocus Blog 